Arizona Republicans expel one of their own . . . you won’t believe why

Happily, the two Justins in Tennessee will soon take their seats in the Legislature and continue representing their districts, especially on gun policy. It’s not likely that Arizona Rep. Liz Harris is going to see a groundswell of support for reinstatement, as we saw with Representatives Jones and Pearson in Tennessee. Harris is a Republican election conspiracy goober who was even too crazy for Arizona’s Republicans in the State House, who just expelled her: 

The Arizona House of Representatives voted to expel Rep. Liz Harris, R-Chandler following an ethics probe that found Harris engaged in “disorderly behavior” for bringing a guest to a public hearing who falsely accused lawmakers of taking bribes from a drug cartel.

Let that sink in: Too crazy for Arizona’s Republicans—the party of Kari Lake and Cyber Ninja “audits.” Expulsion here requires a two-thirds majority, a very high bar, so for Republicans to expel a fellow Republican means the member must’ve done something pretty bad (vote was 46-13). Heck, when Sen. Wendy Rogers made racist, antisemitic remarks and dumped all over Ukraine President Zelenskyy, she was only censured, not booted out.

What Harris did, under the guise of an election conspiracy investigation, was invite a nutter to give a presentation that accused just about everyone in Arizona’s government, and the state’s large Mormon population, of taking bribes and working with drug cartels. Who knew?

In the 41-minute presentation at the joint House and Senate Election Committee hearing in February, Scottsdale insurance agent Jacqueline Breger shocked officials with accusations that Gov. Katie Hobbs, House Speaker Ben Toma, lawmakers, judges, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and others conspired with a Mexican drug cartel and received bribes through a scheme using property deeds.

I won’t go into the bonkers history of who Breger is and how she learned about the supposed bribes and other dirty work, but for none of it did she provide evidence. Suffice to say, her sources are what one judge called “delusional.” But that’s who Rep. Harris, who’s been pushing election fraud BS since Trump lost Arizona in 2020, chose to spotlight.

After Breger’s testimony, however, other members called for an ethics probe of Rep. Harris, who said she didn’t know what Breger was going to say, but that was a lie. Harris is a first-term conspiracy boob who almost makes Kari Lake seem sensible. In fact, this whole chain of events started because the newly installed Rep. Harris refused to cast any vote in the Legislature until the 2022 election was redone (the Arizona election when every Republican election denier for statewide office lost).

To appease Harris and get her to change her mind, because Republicans have a razor-thin majority in the House and need her vote, they said she could hold an election fraud hearing, and that’s where Breger’s nuttery was on display. The ethics probe showed that Harris knew of and supported Breger’s screwball theories, and she worked to hide the details of the mind-boggling presentation from her colleagues. That’s why she was expelled—not so much the crime but the lies and coverup. Old story.

The Nazi Rifle Association . . . long article, will not make the gunhumpers happy

According to a new Kaiser Family Foundation poll, 21% of Americans have been threatened with a gun, 19% tell researchers a family member was killed by a gun, and 17% say they’ve seen someone shot in front of them. Fully 54 percent of Americans or members of their family have had one of these experiences.

Eighty-four percent of Americans consider how to avoid getting shot when they go out in public.

But why?

Why would Republican members of Congress remove the flag pins from their lapels and replace them with little metal pins of AR-15 mass slaughter machines designed for modern warfare?

CNN reporter Bill Weir said the quiet part out loud this week.

When asked by anchor Kaitlan Collins why Texas Governor Greg Abbott was going to pardon a man who murdered a Black Lives Matter protester in cold blood, Weir said:

 “You go back to, there was a guy named Harlon Carter, who was living on the border in Texas back in the 50s. There was some racial tension with Mexicans nearby, he ended up murdering a 15-year-old boy with a shotgun, was convicted of murder, but then released from jail two years early because the judge didn’t explain to the jury the proper definition of self-defense.

“At that time, Harlon Carter went on to be the head of the NRA. At the time, they pivoted from a club that was for marksmanship into a political wing that gave their first endorsement after 100 years to Ronald Reagan in 1980. Now, that’s 180 million guns ago in this country. The political force of that decision — who took the NRA in a place to fortify for a race war instead of a civic gun safety organization — was a key moment in history.”

And he’s right. Our children are dying in our schools and streets so a small minority of white mostly male Americans can prepare for what they hope will be an all-out race war.

Over at The Daily Stormer, before the site moved to less visible venues after being de-platformed by its hosts, America’s actual Nazis vigorously encourage their members to join the NRA because it’s preparing America for a war against Blacks and Jews (who Nazis call “European-style Socialists,” a common and well-known code phrase among antisemites).

Five years ago last month the Stormer’s founder, Andrew Anglin, wrote:

“The NRA is the country’s premiere pro-white and anti-Semitic organization. In fact, it is the only right-wing group of any kind in this country to have any success at all in the last 50 years.”

The article goes on to proclaim:

“The white race in the United States has lost on: Racial integration, Feminism, Homosexuality, Abortion, Prayer in schools, Pornography, [and] Immigration” but has won on “a single issue: guns.”

“And that winning is due almost exclusive to the National Rifle Association, a pro-white and anti-Jewish organization intent on protecting our GUNS from the gun-grabbing kikes… It’s time to put your money where your mouth is and join up with the country’s single effective pro-white organization intent on fully SMASHING THE JEW.”

Echoing Anglin’s commentary, Wayne LaPierre gave a speech a few months later laying out the NRA’s vision of America.

“President Trump’s election,” he said, “while crucial, can’t turn away the wave of these new, European-style Socialists bearing down upon us.”

He then ticked off a list of Jews he saw as enemies of America, including Bernie Sanders, George Soros, Tom Steyer, Michael Bloomberg, and Chuck Schumer. He did not name a single Christian or person of any other religion.

“History proves it,” LaPierre said to cheers from the crowd. “Every time, in every nation in which this political disease rises to power, its citizens are repressed, their freedoms are destroyed, and their firearms are banned and confiscated. It is all backed in this country by the social engineering and the billions [from] people like George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Tom Steyer, and more.”

Over on Fox “News,” frozen-food heir Tucker Carlson is busy echoing Anglin and LaPierre, warning his white supremacist viewers that there’s a “Great Replacement” being engineered in America by shadowy forces manipulating Black and Brown people to replace white people at work and in society.

Christian nationalists show up to try to intimidate the people they believe are being empowered, funded, or directed by “European-style socialists,” ranging from drag queens to Black people to trans children tp “liberal teachers” and their school boards.

They fetishize their guns as the tools that will one day cleanse and “purify” America, per their guidebooks Camp of the Saints and The Turner Diaries.

A Facebook member posted an old quote from Herbert W. Armstrong — founder of The Worldwide Church of God — that said, “Race war is coming! … It will be whipped into an accelerating crescendo until human blood runs like rivers.”

Seeing the comment, NRA board member Ted Nugent replied:

“Yeah no shit. blacks slaughtering blacks at an unprecedented rate. Blacks killed more blacks this week than the KKK has in 50yrs.”

He posted that an hour after declaring former President Obama wanted a “racewar,” saying “Obama will go down in history as a maniac America hating freak…”

At that time, Armstrong was a major spokesman and inspiration for the white Christian nationalist movement — and continues to be revered even in his death.

He was the guy who spent most of his life proclaiming that integration was a violation of the Bible’s demand for racial purity. He preached:

“God separated or segregated the races and national groups about a century after the flood (Deut. 32:8), but the people did not agree with God. They rebelled by building the tower of Babel (Gen. 11). Here was man’s first recorded attempt this side of the flood to cross racial bounds and form one world. God had to intervene and scatter the nations.”

For decades the haters pushing white Americans to buy more and more weapons of war dressed themselves in respectable rhetorical garb, talking about “freedom” and “liberty.” But at its core, the absolutist pro-gun arm-America crusade is inextricably intertwined with a Christian nationalist white supremacist movement that believes white men are destined to rid America of what they call “mud races” and “deviants.”

The NRA’s turn from being a benign sportsman’s organization to arguing the necessity of a heavily armed white civilian population began, as Weir pointed out, when Harlon Carter took over the organization in 1977.

Ever since then, leaders of the NRA and their allies have been promoting faintly coded rhetoric that leans heavily on demonizing and threatening the lives of Jewish Democrats, racial minorities, and queer people.

While this is happening, pretty much right out in the open, most Americans think Republican politicians who refuse to do anything about the slaughter of our children are simply motivated by campaign contributions from gun manufacturers.

In fact, they’re still animated by Harlon Carter’s hatred of “colored” people, Jews, and the queer community.

Carter’s racism led him to kill two non-white people in his life (that we know about). The 15-year-old Hispanic teenager Weir noted who Carter killed in 1931 at close range with a shotgun for talking back to him has been widely reported, but less well known is that, according to the FBI, he also killed a 19-year-old Native American boy named Luther Curly by hitting him with his car in 1970.

As the head of the Border Patrol, Carter ran the notorious “Operation Wetback” in 1954, referring to it as “biggest drive against illegal aliens in history.”

He told The Los Angeles Times:

“An army of Border Patrol officers complete with jeeps, trucks, and seven aircraft” are waging “all-out war to hurl… Mexican wetbacks back into Mexico.”

As Donald Trump pointed out in 2015, praising that openly racist effort by the Eisenhower administration, Carter and his men enthusiastically apprehended and deported more than a million Latin American farm workers. His slogan may as well have been: “Make America White Again.”

And Carter wasn’t the only murderer in the top ranks of the NRA. Robert J. Dowlut, the NRA’s general counsel who was hired the same year as LaPierre, had spent six years in prison for murdering his girlfriend’s mother in 1963, after also robbing and shooting a pawn shop owner. It wasn’t until 2014 that his crimes became known to the public.

“Tough on criminals” is not a meaningful slogan for the NRA.

The constant whining about “crime in America” that we’re hearing this week from, for example, Jim Jordan — who says he’s going to New York to expose Black DA Alvin Bragg’s “crime ridden city” — is more rhetorical misdirection. Crime is way down in New York City: it’s not even in the top 65 cities in America for homicides, for example.

What they’re really saying is, “Look at all those Black and Brown people and the ‘European-style Socialist’ Jews who are helping them out!”

As Wayne LaPierre wrote for Tucker Carlson’s Daily Caller in 2013:

“After Hurricane Sandy, we saw the hellish world that the gun prohibitionists see as their utopia. Looters ran wild in south Brooklyn. There was no food, water or electricity. And if you wanted to walk several miles to get supplies, you better get back before dark, or you might not get home at all.

“Hurricanes. Tornadoes. Riots. Terrorists. Gangs. Lone criminals. These are perils we are sure to face—not just maybe. It’s not paranoia to buy a gun. It’s survival. It’s responsible behavior, and it’s time we encourage law-abiding Americans to do just that.

“The hard truth is that due to Bloomberg, Soros, and the rest of their ilk, the dangers require that we increase our presence all across the country—in Congress, the state capitols, and in your city and towns.”

It’s really all about race, religion, gender, and power, and a group of people willing to kill others to restore what they see as America’s rightful racial and gender hierarchies.

It’s as simple as that.

As Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz told the Boston Review in 2021:

“I think what the NRA—and Carter specifically—did was to simply revive something that had waned, because it was for a moment no longer needed.

“Slave patrols were not needed. The KKK wasn’t needed, because the Jim Crow state had taken on that role of racial enforcer.

“But as that began to break down with civil rights, Carter handed to the descendants of the white settler population this tool for their empowerment, the new NRA.”

When Marjorie Taylor Greene talks about a “national divorce,” or Sharon Angle and Donald Trump warn of “Second Amendment solutions” to Democrats winning elections, or Greg Abbott says he’s going to pardon a man who murdered a BLM protester, or Ron DeSantis parades Black men in shackles in front of the cameras for “illegally voting,” they’re all saying the same thing.

They’re proclaiming that their version of America is the America of the 1930s, when white men ran the country, women were men’s playthings, gays and lesbians were in the closet, Jews kept their heads’ down, and racial minorities “knew their place.”

In the 40 years since the beginning of the Reagan Revolution — one kicked off by Reagan proclaiming “states’ rights” in Philadelphia, Mississippi where 3 civil rights workers were brutally murdered — America has gone from having around 30 guns for every 100 people (like Canada today) to over 120 guns for every 100 people today.

And they’re not evenly distributed across the country: Red states have a much higher gun death rate than Blue states, almost without exception, because they have far more guns per person.

Massachusetts, for example, has only seen 2 children die in school shootings in decades because of their strong gun laws. Nations like Canada and most of Europe, where guns are available but well-regulated, have only a tiny fraction of the gun deaths and injuries we experience here in America.

But America being flooded with guns isn’t an accident and it’s not just because the gun industry wants to increase their revenues.

As is so often the case in this country, tragically, our plague of guns results from the racist fever dreams of white supremacists willing to kill to achieve a “restored” America.

Which is also why these same white supremacist Republicans insist on leaving semiautomatic and assault weapons-of-war in the hands of America’s civilians. They are, after all, asking armed white men to join up, to prepare to kill their fellow Americans in a real civil war.

And even if there is no war, our children are now paying the price for the GOP’s embrace of this hate and bigotry — and the guns that go with it — every single day.

More memorials to treason and traitors removed in 2022 . . . a lot more to go

Despite the trauma they inflict on Black and Brown communities, several Southern states continue to observe “Confederate Memorial Day” in April that glorifies and whitewashes the shameful legacy of the Confederacy. The true legacy of the Confederacy, which is often minimized or erased completely by these celebrations, was to preserve the institution of slavery and promote white supremacy.

Strong progress toward removing Confederate iconography from the American landscape — a critical part of telling the hard history of slavery and racism in this country — has been made, yet Southern states continue to block the removal of Confederate symbols.

Currently, seven states (AlabamaArkansasGeorgiaMississippiNorth CarolinaSouth Carolina and Tennessee) have enacted preservation laws to block the removal of Confederate memorials. This legislation is designed to deny the will of communities who do not want symbols that glorify white supremacy littering their public spaces by forcing the symbols to remain in place.

These regressive preservation laws were enacted between 2000 and 2021 — more than 135 years after the Civil War was lost — to keep false heroes on a pedestal. But Americans recognize these symbols represent hate instead of heritage and do not tell our entire, shared history.

The SPLC has tracked public symbols of the Confederacy across the United States through our Whose Heritage? research project since 2015. New data shows that 48 Confederate symbols were removed, renamed or relocated from public spaces last year.

  • 16 of those symbols were Confederate monuments. Comparatively, 17 Confederate statues were removed in 2021.
  • For the third straight year, Virginia leads the nation by removing 13 Confederate symbols from public spaces. Louisiana and North Carolina tied at seven for second place, and New York and Texas tied at five for third place.
  • Out of the more than 2,600 Confederate symbols that are still publicly present across the U.S., 47 symbols are still pending removal in 11 states: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia, as well as Puerto Rico.
  • Ten of the 47 symbols pending removal are schools that are expected to be renamed in Alabama (1), Georgia (1), South Carolina (4) and Virginia (4).
  • A total of 482 Confederate symbols have been removed, renamed, or relocated from public spaces following the Charleston massacre on June 17, 2015.

These are just a few examples of the extraordinary work being done by communities across the South and beyond, rejecting revisionist history and removing Confederate memorials in all their inhumane forms.

Last year, a federal Naming Commission identified more than 800 items honoring the Confederacy on military property. The fact that they are located in 20 states and Washington, D.C., as well as Germany and Japan, reveal just how deeply rooted white supremacy culture has been within military ranks. As the military works to remove all Confederate iconography by the Naming Commission’s January 2024 deadline, the SPLC will continue to support and encourage local activists who are challenging this age-old propaganda campaign.

Former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis feels the wrath of MAGAts

One-time Trump attorney Jenna Ellis, who was a leading figure in pushing falsehoods about the 2020 presidential election, is now being attacked by some prominent Trump supporters for being insufficiently loyal to the MAGA cause.

Writing on Twitter, Ellis posted screen shots of some recent posts from top MAGA influencers lobbing a number of crude insults against her.

Included among them was a post from failed Florida congressional candidate Laura Loomer, who mocked her for being “disowned by Trumpworld” and trying to ingratiate herself with Ron DeSantis’ campaign by offering herself up as “sloppy seconds.”

Fellow Trump supporter Preston Parra took a similar line of attack and accused her of being a “for hire escort for Ron DeSantis.”

And MAGA fan Alex Bruesewitz referred to her as “Jebba Ellis” before going on to describe her as a “D-list reject goon.”

Ellis bitterly complained about the treatment she’s received from the former president’s fans.

“I was called a lot of things and had a lot of leftist hit pieces trying to destroy my credibility while I represented Trump,” she wrote. “But I never saw a media outlet or journo use the blatant sexism and vulgarity that “MAGA influencers” do now. And I don’t even work for DeSantis. Telling.”


COMMENT

Two lessons should be learned from Ms. Ellis’ experiences.

  1. Everything that Trump touches dies and everything that reaches out to touch Trump dies.
  2. Trump’s base is largely in the “evangelical christian” crowd.  There is no more vindictive and nasty person than an evangelical Christian and when you get a crowd of them together they are a pit of vipers and snarling, snapping mad dogs. The fact that they continue to make up the largest percentage of Trump’s MAGA base explains a lot of what we’re seeing now that Trump is imploding.

April 8-9, 1865: A legacy that haunts us to this day . . . and beyond

On April 8, 1865, General Ulysses S. Grant was having a hard night.

His army had been harrying the treasonous “Confederate General” Lee’s rabble for days, and Grant knew it was only a question of time before Lee had to surrender. The people in the Virginia countryside were starving, and Lee’s army was melting away. Just that morning a Confederate colonel had thrown himself on Grant’s mercy after realizing that he was the only man in his entire regiment who had not already abandoned the cause. But while Grant had twice asked Lee to surrender, Lee still insisted his men could fight on.

So, on the night of April 8, Grant retired to bed in a Virginia farmhouse, dirty, tired, and miserable with a migraine. He spent the night “bathing my feet in hot water and mustard and putting mustard plasters on my wrists and the back part of my neck, hoping to be cured by morning.” It didn’t work. When morning came, Grant pulled on his clothes from the day before and rode out to the head of his column with his head throbbing.

As he rode, an escort arrived with a note from Lee requesting an interview for the purpose of surrendering his so-called “Army of Northern Virginia.”

“When the officer reached me, I was still suffering with the sick headache,” Grant recalled, “but the instant I saw the contents of the note I was cured.”

The two men met in the home of Wilmer McLean in the village of Appomattox Court House, Virginia. Lee had dressed grandly for the occasion in a brand-new general’s uniform carrying a dress sword; Grant wore simply the “rough garb” of a private with the shoulder straps of a lieutenant general.

But the images of the wealthy, noble South and the humble North hid a very different reality. As soon as the papers were signed, Lee told Grant his men were starving and asked if the Union general could provide the “Confederates” with rations. Grant didn’t hesitate. “Certainly,” he responded, before asking how many men needed food. He took Lee’s answer—”about twenty-five thousand”—in stride, telling the general that “he could have…all the provisions wanted.”

By spring 1865, the white supremacist treasonous “Confederates” who had ridden off to war four years before boasting that their wealthy aristocrats would beat the North’s moneygrubbing shopkeepers in a single battle were broken and starving, while, backed by a booming industrial economy, the Union army could provide rations for twenty-five thousand men on a moment’s notice.

The Civil War was won not by the dashing sons of wealthy planters, but by men like Grant, who dragged himself out of his blankets and pulled a dirty soldier’s uniform over his pounding head on an April morning because he knew he had to get up and get to work.

Soldiers and sailors of the United States had defeated the armies and the navy of the treasonous “Confederate States of America” across the country and the seas, at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives and almost $6 billion. To the northerners celebrating in the streets, it certainly looked like the South’s ideology had been thoroughly discredited.

Southern politicians had led their poorer neighbors to war to advance the idea that some people were better than others and had the right—and the duty—to rule and to enslave “those people.”  Southern politicians claimed the Founders had made a terrible mistake when they declared, “All men are created equal.” In place of that “fundamentally wrong” idea, they proposed “the great truth” that white men were a “superior race.” And within that superior race, some men were better than others.

They were the ones who should rule the majority, southern leaders explained. “We do not agree with the authors of the Declaration of Independence, that governments ‘derive their just powers from the consent of the governed,’” enslaver George Fitzhugh of Virginia wrote in 1857. “All governments must originate in force and be continued by force.” There were 18,000 people in his county and only 1,200 could vote, he said, “But we twelve hundred . . . never asked and never intend to ask the consent of the sixteen thousand eight hundred whom we govern.”

But the majority of Americans recognized that if it were permitted to take hold, this ideology would destroy democracy. They fought to defeat the enslavers’ radical new definition of the United States. By the end of 1863, President Abraham Lincoln dated the birth of the nation not to the Constitution, whose protection of property underpinned southern enslavers’ insistence that enslavement was a foundational principle, but to the Declaration of Independence.

“Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.”

The events of April 9 reassured Americans that they had, in fact, saved “the last best hope of earth”: democracy.

So confident was General Grant in the justice of his people’s cause that he asked only that Lee and his men give their word that they would never again fight against the United States and that they turn over their military arms and artillery. The men could keep their sidearms and their horses because Grant wanted them “to be able to put in a crop to carry themselves and their families through the next winter.”

Their victory on the battlefields made northerners think they had made sure that “government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

But their conviction that generosity would bring white southerners around to accepting the equality promised in the Declaration of Independence backfired. After Lincoln’s assassination, Andrew Johnson of Tennessee took over the presidency and worked hard to restore white supremacy without the old legal structure of enslavement, while white settlers in the West brought their hierarchical ideas with them and imposed them on Indigenous Americans, on Mexicans and Mexican Americans, and on Asians and Pacific Islanders.

With no penalty for their attempt to overthrow democracy, those who thought that white men were better than others began to insist that their cause was just and that they had lost the war only because they had been overpowered.   Led by the treasonous “United Daughters of the Confederacy” and “Sons of Confederate Veterans” they generated the myth of “The Lost Cause”; in the late 19th Century they started erecting statues to the traitors who led the rebellion against the nation as well as putting in place the “Black Codes” and “Jim Crow” laws that essentially restored slavery.

They continued to work to make their ideology the law of the land. That idea inspired the Jim Crow and Juan Crow laws of the late-nineteenth and twentieth centuries, as well as the policies that crowded Indigenous Americans onto reservations where disease and malnutrition killed many of them and lack of opportunity pushed the rest into poverty.

In the 1930s, Nazi leaders, lawyers, and judges turned to America’s Jim Crow laws and Indian reservations for inspiration on how to create legal hierarchies that would, at the very least, wall certain populations off from white society.

More Americans than we like to believe embraced fascism here, too: in February 1939, more than 20,000 people showed up for a “true Americanism” rally held by Nazis at New York City’s Madison Square Garden. The event featured a huge portrait of George Washington in his Continental Army uniform flanked by swastikas.

The decision of government officials 158 years ago to trust in the goodwill of former “Confederates” rather than execut3e or jail the traitors, and, focus on justice for everyone else seemed at the time to be the honorable and best course for healing the divided nation. But it ended up protecting the “Confederates” and disheartening those who had fought for the United States. “When the Union men of those States who have suffered every kind of outrage, who have been fined, mobbed, imprisoned, and have seen their Union neighbors hunted and tortured and hung for their fidelity to the Government, see… a conspicuous, leading traitor hastily pardoned by the President that he may become Governor,” wrote Harper’s Weekly a little more than a year after Lee surrendered,

“When they see members of the Cabinet deliberately annulling the law of the land in order to appoint late rebels to national offices, while the most noted and tried Union men in the insurgent States ask in vain for such recognition of their fidelity, how can such men help bitterly feeling the contemptuous scorn with which the triumphant rebels regard them? How can they help asking why they might not as well have been rebels? How can they help the conviction that the policy of the Executive is conciliation of rebels and not recognition of Union men, or avoid asking with intense incredulity whether this is the way in which treason is to be made odious?”

Meanwhile, for 150 years following their defeat, the sons of the traitors who formed the “Confederate States of America” voted unanimously for the Democratic Party and continued to press to idea of white supremacy. . . until July 1948 when Democratic President Harry Truman ordered the de-segregation of the US armed forces. 

After Roosevelt died, the new president Harry S. Truman established a highly visible President’s Committee on Civil Rights and issued Executive Order 9981 to end discrimination in the military in 1948. A group of Southern governors, including Strom Thurmond of South Carolina and Fielding L. Wright of Mississippi, met to consider the place of Southerners within the Democratic Party. After a tense meeting with Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairman and Truman confidant J. Howard McGrath, the Southern governors agreed to convene their own convention in Birmingham, Alabama, if Truman and civil rights supporters emerged victorious at the 1948 Democratic National Convention.  In July, the convention nominated Truman to run for a full term and adopted a plank proposed by Northern liberals led by Hubert Humphrey calling for civil rights; 35 Southern delegates walked out. The move was on to remove Truman’s name from the ballot in the southern United States. This political maneuvering required the organization of a new and distinct political party, which the Southern defectors from the Democratic Party chose to brand as the States’ Rights Democratic Party – the “Dixiecrats” for short.  (Thurmond, later a Representative then Senator, himself had fathered a mixed-race child with a Black maid in his family’s home.)

Following President Lyndon Johnson’s passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, the solidly Democratic old “Confederacy” began to crumble, spurred on by Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy,” aimed at attracting Southern whites who were viscerally angry at the Democratic Party’s embrace of equal justice and equal rights, especially voting rights.  Nixon and later Reagan completed the transition of the white supremacist South from solidly Democratic to solidly Democratic Republican.

Today’s Republican South still holds to many of the myths that led to treason and rebellion in the furtherance of the claim that one “race” of people should have the right to control, own, and enslave another “race.”  And that, folks, is the legacy of April 8-9, 1865.

 

Things are going as expected for Speaker Cave-In McCarthy

Simmering tensions among House Republicans flared anew over the weekend, following a New York Times report that detailed how Kevin McCarthy’s (R., Calif.) bitterly contested speakership battle has undermined his confidence in colleagues.

While it took McCarthy a historic 15 ballots to secure the position through January’s chaos and infighting, the speaker reportedly remains particularly frustrated by certain Republicans — including Jodey Arrington (R., Texas) and Steve Scalise (R., La.), the budget committee chairman and House majority leader, respectively.

“Mr. McCarthy has told colleagues he has no confidence in Mr. Arrington, the man responsible for delivering a budget framework laying out the spending cuts that Republicans have said they will demand in exchange for any move to increase the debt limit,” Jonathan Swan and Annie Karni wrote in the Times. McCarthy still regards Arrington, who sought to nominate Scalise during the speakership balloting, “as incompetent, according to more than half a dozen people familiar with this his thinking,” the Times revealed.

The leaks, in turn, appear only to have further chilled relations between McCarthy and some members of the conference.

“The members I’ve spoken with are just stunned by his rebuking of his budget chair, and certainly of our leadership,” an unnamed House Republican told Axios on Saturday. The representative expressed doubts McCarthy will serve the full extent of his speakership term.