I don’t normally do something like this, but . . .

DO NOT EVER IN YOUR LIFETIME ORDER FROM A COMPANY NAMED LITFAD.

The company is a scam all the way.  You cannot get refunds, the stuff is junk all the way.

LITFAD — they appear to be doing business out of China.  I paid with PayPal, I was charged twice — once through PayPal, a second charge through a Chinese PayPal.

JD “Not A Hillbilly Vance” Vance continues to make an ass of himself

Anyone who has served 30 seconds in the military knows one rule:  Do not wear a hat or cap in the mess hall.  Anyone, that is, except JD Vance.

Vance loves to proclaim about his service as a Marine — where he was a Marine Corps journalist, not a combat Marine.

Which may explain why, when recently visiting Marines at Quantico, Virginia, he violated this cardinal rule of military decorum.

Veterans slam J.D. Vance for disregarding a mess hall rule 'Marines learn on day 1'

Notice, too, that he is seated with two female Marines — after Secretary of Defense Pete Hogsbreath denounced “DEI” troops.

Vance, Hogsbreath, and Trump – – – incompetent lying jackasses.

JD “Not A Hillbilly” Vance is a bad joke and an embarrassment to us all

Trump’s sabre-rattling over Greenland is nothing to laugh about. But making JD Vance the administration’s would-be Bad Cop with his wife the Good Cop who looks perpetually like she’s in a hostage video . . . .  is, well, a bad joke and an embarrassment to what was once a powerful nation.

Mr. Egede and other Greenland officials made it clear that the Americans were not welcome for a visit. The White House had to scrap a good-will tour by Usha Vance, the vice president’s wife, who had been planning to attend a dog sled race and hold conversations with ordinary Greenlanders. As it became clear that the roads around Nuuk, the capital, would be lined with protesters, the visit was moved just to the Space Force base, where distance from any population center and high fences assured there would be no visible dissent.

Mr. Vance’s audience was American troops, not Greenlanders, once his wife’s trip was turned into a vice-presidential mission. But he was clearly talking to a larger audience when, before getting back on his plane and returning to warmer climes in Washington, he made the case that the United States would be a far better steward for Greenland than Denmark has been for several hundred years.

[…]

In an exchange with reporters, Mr. Vance seemed to acknowledge that the drive to acquire the territory had as much to do with Mr. Trump as the national security threat. “We can’t just ignore this place,” he said at one point. “We can’t just ignore the president’s desires. But most importantly, we can’t ignore what I said earlier, which is the Russian and Chinese encroachment in Greenland.”

“When the president says we’ve got to have Greenland, he’s saying this island is not safe,” he said. “A lot of people are interested in it. A lot of people are making a play.” But he was careful to say the decision about whom to partner with was Greenland’s. (Mr. Trump himself has not put it in such voluntary terms.)

Just before he left, Mr. Vance was asked if military plans had been drafted to take Greenland if it declines to become an American protectorate.

“We do not think that military force is ever going to be necessary,” he said. “We think the people of Greenland are rational and good, and we think we’re going to be able to cut a deal, Donald Trump-style, to ensure the security of this territory, but also the United States of America.”

“We are going to make a deal, Donald Trump style, with the people I’m literally hiding out at a military base to avoid interacting with because they all despise me.”

 

Republicans and the Trump administration are attempting to resurrect the Confederacy

The Trump administration has spent the last month on a tear, using President Donald Trump’s newfound power in multiple departments and agencies for a goal that seems bewildering at first glance: deleting history.

Under the guise of eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, the administration has literally erased government-maintained documents honoring and remembering key figures and moments from U.S. and world history.

The Department of Defense removed a photo of the Enola Gay B-29 bomber because it contains the word “gay.” Arlington Cemetery scrapped then reinstated a tribute to Jackie Robinson, the first Black man to play Major League Baseball and an Army lieutenant.

Photos and histories of people of color, women, and the LGBTQ+ community are being purged, and nearly every day some new erasure is being uncovered. When caught in the act, the Trump administration has offered up the claim that these cases were merely mistakes—“malicious compliance” from bad actors within the government.

But the excuses don’t pass the smell test, since Trump and his allies—like multibillionaire Elon Musk and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—have well documented histories of open bigotry against anyone who isn’t a straight, wealthy, white man.

But there is one unique period in U.S. history that Trump and his cronies are very interested in preserving and promoting: the Confederacy.

Quick reminder: The Confederates, attempting to preserve the practice of enslaving Black people, illegally declared war against the government of the United States—starting the Civil War that killed hundreds of thousands—and ultimately was utterly defeated and humiliated.

The administration has most notably advocated on behalf of the pro-slavery Confederacy that rebelled against the U.S. government by reinstating the names of Confederate figures at military facilities. Under the Biden administration, it was determined that it was best to remove names honoring a racist, traitorous group that declared war on the country. Trump feels otherwise.

Trump brought back Fort Benning, named after Henry Lewis Benning—a lover of slavery—and renamed Fort Liberty to Fort Bragg, named after a Confederate general. The administration has played cute with this restoration of names and attempted to argue that the “new” names honor servicemembers, but the true intent to restore the Confederacy is quite clear.

Trump’s love of the Confederacy isn’t new. During his first term, he railed against local and state efforts to move Confederate monuments out of the public eye.

So intense is Trump’s admiration for the pro-slavery Confederacy that he has frequently attacked one of the country’s most revered leaders, Abraham Lincoln. Trump—who failed to pass an infrastructure bill or get his southern wall built—has complained that Lincoln failed to prevent the Civil War.

But this isn’t just a Trump thing. For decades, conservatives have embraced the mythology of the Lost Cause. After losing the Civil War, many Confederates and their descendants have desperately tried to rewrite the causes of the war and the treasonous actions of the Confederate military and its leaders.

They argue that the secessionists were fighting for a noble, lost cause—usually something about taxation and states’ rights—omitting the central argument behind the Confederacy: It wanted enslaved Black people pick cotton and do other jobs for free.

This is directly tied to the origins of the modern conservative movement and the Republican Party. In 1964, conservatives took full ideological control of the GOP with candidate Barry Goldwater, who was opposed to the Civil Rights Act and lost in a landslide to Democratic President Lyndon Johnson, who signed the law with Martin Luther King Jr. at his side.

King warned voters of the dangers of Goldwater, in an extraordinarily unusual step into electoral politics, highlighting his opposition to the bill.

According to Johnson aide Bill Moyers, when the president signed the bill he said, “Well, I think we may have lost the south for your lifetime—and mine,” referencing the fact that conservative southern Democrats were vehemently opposed to the bill and would turn away from the party.

And Johnson was right. Those voters became Republicans as the party moved further to the right, and their ideology forms the core of the MAGA voters who have backed Trump in the last three elections.

When the rest of the country moved forward on racial issues, resulting in the election of the first Black president, Barack Obama, in 2008, the right did not. Trump led the racist birther movement, which falsely argued that Obama was ineligible to be president.

But even after Trump won, the push for racial justice did not stop. Protests like the Black Lives Matter movement emerged with Trump in the White House, and no matter how much he fumed about it, they didn’t relent.

The right is in a quandary. It has political power, but it still cannot force millions of Americans to concede to the white supremacy that motivates much of conservative politics. That’s why it’s so driven to erase history.

When Trump and his administration push for the Confederacy and try to disappear the diverse past, they are delivering on the political primal scream that the right emitted after Obama won.

It’s doubtful that Trump will succeed in erasing the country’s collective memory, but like the men who tried to keep chattel slavery legal, Republicans are willing to give their crusade one last Confederate try.

 

Does anyone understand what is happening to the US??

Do we realize & understand & grasp that we are living in a pivotal moment of history?

The fall of the American Empire.

Throughout history there have been empires that rose and fell. I wonder, how many of their citizens at the time understood that their empire was falling? That they were living in the midst of it?

Some countries have lived through the ending of their empires and are good nations today such as the British and the Dutch with Britain and The Netherlands being fine democratic nations. I don’t believe we will be as fortunate here in the US. We may survive, but we will never be the same again. Too bad because for most of our history  we were a decent nation., although imperfect.

I’d reckon that the other free and democratic nations are amazed at how quickly our democracy was brought to its knees but I’m sure there were people who saw it coming.

But we were guilty of the sin of pride, like other empires had been, that ours would last forever. I certainly never believed I would be alive to witness its fall. After all, my family had been here for nearly 400 years and I thought I might make it through a decent retirement never believing it would all fall apart so quickly aided by the millions who voted for Trump along with others who were too complacent and over confident to vote.

Sadly, our fall here in the US will not be one of a decent transition to a good democratic nation. No, our fall will be one into a nation dedicated to evil and hate. I know there are some, many who believe my epitaph is premature but I am, honestly, out of hope. Will there be a civil war? Well, unlike our Civil War today we do not have a clear line of demarcation between slave and free states. Maybe our trouble now had its roots in the Civil War because the Slave states were not a bastion of democracy and after they destroyed Reconstruction, the South turned into an oligarchy, ruled by the former planters — all white.

But here we are now and if you feel you can do anything in the way of resistance, good luck. MAGA and the uninformed, hate-filled people who support Trump are united in their evil while we Democrats are mired in disagreements.

I’ve voted exclusive for Democratic candidates for over 60 years now and I hope I get the chance to vote again although I’m not hopeful — I suspect we have seen our last election.

Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Putin would have been proud of Trump’s “speech” at Dept of Justice

Grandpa Simpson visited the Justice Department on Friday, giving a speech that must have given even his handlers pause, a campaign stump speech delivered in front of the Seal of the Department of Justice. It included both swearing—the prosecutions against him were “bullshit”—and a hate-filled screed against political rivals including Joe Biden and lawyers who have brought cases against him.

Trump’s Attorney General, Pam Bondi, started the program, sounding more like a presenter at a TV awards show than an attorney general. She lauded Donald Trump’s accomplishments fighting the war on drugs (although he’s been in office for only two months, not much time for major developments) and praised “the unsung hero Stephen Miller.” It was a political rally speech. It was not appropriate for the Justice Department.

It’s worth taking a beat to reflect on why politics and the Justice Department don’t mix. The power of the prosecutor is expansive. Prosecutors have power over peoples’ lives and liberty. An unscrupulous prosecutor could exercise that power in a fashion that inflicts damage on people who have done nothing to merit it.

Our system contains multiple checks, both internally at DOJ and in the courts, that make that sort of conduct by a rogue prosecutor unlikely and subject to severe punishment on rare occasions where they occur. Even inadvertent misconduct by prosecutors is treated seriously. But imagine a DOJ with no internal checks, a DOJ where “the boss”—the president—demands revenge, and prosecutors are instructed, either directly or, say, in the form of a speech delivered by the president, to go after people he considers enemies using all the power at their disposal. People who haven’t committed any crimes could be prosecuted, possibly jailed. They could be sued civilly. And because there would be power to shield misconduct from public view if DOJ itself has been corrupted—and we’re not talking about just a rogue lone wolf—there are far fewer limits on the damage that can be done.

Trump, for instance, called out lawyers who have brought cases against him in his speech. He has already, through executive orders, excoriated law firms he doesn’t like. He has signaled who he thinks is deserving of punishment. This could end with people in prison for no reason other than the fact that the current president doesn’t like them. And that’s no way to run a democracy. That’s not a democracy.

Typically, an event like this would have been open to employees, and anyone who was interested could have wandered by and listened from the balcony above the Great Hall if the seats down below were filled. NBC’s Ken Dilanian reported that career folks were told they could only go if they had an invite, and few of them were invited. Instead, the Great Hall was filled with Trump supporters, including red state attorneys general and people like Stephen Miller. What came next made clear why that was the case.

It was open season for petty vendettas and old wounds that are apparently still fresh for the president. It was a story in which he was the victim, condemning in others the same behavior he himself freely engages in. It was a speech that diminished both the presidency and the Justice Department in an era where there is already far too much of that going around. And he drew applause, repeatedly, from the crowd.

Trump referred to his former defense lawyers, who now occupy the key jobs at DOJ, by name as people he was with in front of “corrupt judges”—meaning judges overseeing criminal cases and civil cases against him. He referred to a senior counselor at DOJ and said he’d been “watching him on TV these last couple of weeks.” Trump’s political appointees at DOJ and their aides all get what the job is if they want to catch the boss’s attention. And he shouted out former general and former convicted (until Trump pardoned him) felon Mike Flynn “a man who went to hell.” He called Stephen Miller “something very special.”

Trump: “We must be honest about the lies and abuses that have occurred within these walls … They weaponized the vast powers of our law enforcement and intelligence agencies to try to thwart the will of the American people.”

Trump rehashed old grievances: Hunter Biden’s laptop, “spying” on his campaign, unspecified persecution of his family. He claimed outrage over the execution of a lawful search warrant, signed by a federal judge, for Mar-a-Lago, even though it uncovered classified documents Trump had in his possession, precisely what prosecutors told the judge they expected to find based on probable cause. It was a diatribe of lies and grudges.

Trump had trouble staying on topic. At one point, while discussing what he characterized as anti-Christian discrimination, he wandered off into “we did very well with the Catholic vote, so I want to thank them for that.” Rank, political stuff. Trump also mentioned his “mandate”—even though he won the election with less than 50% of the popular vote. Trump attacked lawyers by name, calling out Marc Elias, Norm Eisen, and Andrew Weissman in the course of his speech. He made it clear that he is still stuck on old, unfounded political grievances.

It was a disgraceful speech to give in an institution committed to holding itself outside of politics.

It was also bizarre and meandering, a president off script and rambling. He slipped in and out of talking about Bobby Knight and Indiana basketball, telling a story about meeting Knight, whom he characterized as a fan of his. He said Knight told him to call if he ever wanted to get into politics and gave him his phone number on a slip of paper and then a couple of years later Trump went looking for it and found it in a stack of paper. “It was a miracle,” he said. And then, free association in full bloom, he said that another miracle was his ear, which he gestured to, as a reminder of the July assassination attempt. The crowd applauded. A woman, perhaps Bondi, could be heard offering up an “amen.” Trump returned to talk of Knight’s support for him.

It was every Trump rally you’ve ever seen. But it was delivered in the Great Hall of Justice. Anyone with any integrity would have walked out of the Great Hall of Justice if anyone had tried to desecrate it like that. But “integrity” is not a word associated with Trump and his followers.

Law Professor John Barrett tells the story of a very different speech coming from the Justice Department: “On Monday, April 1, 1940, Robert H. Jackson—age 48, three months into his service as Attorney General of the United States—gave one of his most important, famous, enduring speeches: “The Federal Prosecutor.” He spoke on that day to the country’s chief federal prosecutors, the U.S. Attorneys who then were serving in each Federal Judicial District across the country. They were assembled in the Great Hall at the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., for the Second Annual Conference of U.S. Attorneys.”

The speech Jackson gave included these wise words: “If the prosecutor is obliged to choose his cases, it follows that he can choose his defendants. Therein is the most dangerous power of the prosecutor.” Jackson understood that if politics pervaded prosecution, then people could be prosecuted because their views were unpopular or they were out of favor, not because they had committed serious crimes. Jackson, unlike Trump, encouraged prosecutors to guard against this and protect democracy.

Before Pam Bondi, there was another former Florida attorney general who became attorney general of the United States, Janet Reno. In her farewell speech, she said of democracy, “It is a fragile institution. The rule of law is fragile. The rule of law is based on people, and democracy is based on people.” She told prosecutors to do their best to protect it.

A very different message from a very different era.

We’re in this together,

 

This is how SECDEF Hogsbreath will get black men out of the Marine Corps

There’s a genetic condition called Pseudofolliculitis Barbae (PFB) that almost exclusively affects Black males. What it is: In people with naturally tightly-curled hair the hair can grow back into the skin. If they shave it’ll cause scarring. In the military, anyone who has this is eligible for a waiver from shaving.

In 2022, the US Marine Corps issued guidance that Marines with PFB couldn’t be discriminated against.

Yesterday, the USMC issued new guidance that Marines who couldn’t be cured of PFB within a year can be discharged for it as PFB is “incompatible with military service.”

This is what happens when you have a Secretary of Defense who is a DUI appointee.

Here it is: Moral depravity and mid-stage dementia in action

One of the keys to the Trump era is that Trump’s increasingly demented ramblings are as a matter of routine cleaned up by not just the right wing media, but by the legacy media that pointed out a few million times that Joe Biden’s debate performance raised serious questions about whether he should continue to be president of the United States.  Trump’s demented rantings are the product of a mind that is deep into mid-stage dementia, if not worse.

Here’s the thing unfiltered:

Trump: “What if anything? What if a bomb drops on your head right now? Okay, what if they broke it? I don‘t know. They broke it with Biden because Biden didn‘t respect him. They didn‘t respect Obama. They respect me. Let me tell you, Putin went through a hell of a lot with me. He went through a phony witch hunt where they used him and Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia … You ever hear of that deal? That was a phony. That was a phony Hunter Biden, Joe Biden scam. Hillary Clinton, shifty Adam Schiff, it was a Democrat scam. And he had to go through that. And he did go through it. We didn‘t end up in a war. And he went through it. He was accused of all that stuff. He had nothing to do with it. It came out of Hunter Biden‘s bathroom. It came out of Hunter Biden‘s bedroom. It was disgusting. And then they said, oh, oh, the laptop from hell was made by Russia. The 51 agents The whole thing was a scam. And he had to put up with that. He was being accused of all that stuff. All I can say is this: he might have broken deals with Obama and Bush, and he might have broken them with Biden. He did maybe, maybe he didn‘t. I don‘t know what happened, but he didn‘t break them with me. He wants to make a deal…

…The problem is I’ve empowered you to be a tough guy, and I don’t think you’d be a tough guy without the United States. And your people are very brave, but you’re either going to make a deal or we’re out, and if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. I don’t think it’s going to be pretty, but you’ll fight it out, but you don’t have the cards, but once we sign that deal you’re in a much better position. But you’re not acting at all thankful and that’s not a nice thing, I’ll be honest. That’s not a nice thing… All right. I think we‘ve seen enough…

“This is going to be great television. I will say that.”

This is morally depraved, but it’s also incoherent paranoid ranting, at a level that makes Biden’s verbal stumbling during the debate  sound innocuous by comparison.

People get used to pretty much anything over time, and what we’ve gotten used to is that, in addition to all the other things that make Trump the worst president in US history, some combination of aging and Adderall, and/or whatever other drugs he’s abusing, is gradually transforming him into a demented old man. A happy family would take the car keys away from him; our unhappy national family will apparently have to deal with this in its own idiosyncratic way.

I really don’t think anything like four years of this is sustainable, even by our sclerotic and decadent political institutions. How they will eventually rid themselves of this turbulent grifter remains to be seen.