While THE ONLY President of the US shows courage, Republicons are their usual asshole selves

While THE ONLY President of the US showed us what courage really is, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) explicitly called for dividing the nation. She tweeted: “We need a national divorce. We need to separate by red states and blue states and shrink the federal government. Everyone I talk to says this.”  Interesting that elite southern enslavers in the 1850s made this same argument because they resented the majority rule that threatened their ability to impose their will on their Black neighbors.

Former representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) helpfully reviewed “some of the governing principles of America” for Greene, tweeting: “Our country is governed by the Constitution. You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Secession is unconstitutional. No member of Congress should advocate secession, Marjorie.”

What Greene had to say next is of more interest in this moment. The Munich Security Conference, the world’s largest gathering for international security discussions, has just reported that the Russian war on Ukraine is a war of authoritarianism on a rules-based international order. At that conference, Vice President Kamala Harris said the U.S. had determined that Russia has committed crimes against humanity and noted that the bipartisan U.S. delegation to the conference was the largest we have ever sent. The U.S. president has just entered a war zone to declare U.S. support for democracy and is now in Poland, where he will speak with the leaders of the nine countries that make up NATO’s eastern flank and will deliver a speech that Blinken has described as “very significant.”

In contrast, Greene echoed authoritarian leaders Viktor Orbán of Hungary and Putin himself when she called for splitting the nation over “the sick and disgusting woke culture issues shoved down our throats” and “the Democrat’s [sic] traitorous America Last policies.” Authoritarian leaders insist that the equality that underpins liberal democracy threatens traditional society because it means that LGBTQ people, women, and minorities should have the same rights as white men. Greene is taking the same position. 

Meanwhile, Fox News Channel personalities, including Tucker Carlson, are trying to spin Biden’s visit to Ukraine as proof that he doesn’t care about the train derailment in Ohio. Scholar of disinformation behavior Caroline Orr Bueno noted: “There’s a narrative being planted here; watch how support for Ukraine is framed as incompatible with US national interests.” She notes that a similar narrative in Canada argues that support for Ukraine hurts Canadian veterans.

A filing in Dominion Voter Systems’ lawsuit against FNC for defamation revealed last week that FNC personalities knowingly lied to their viewers about the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, acting as a propaganda outlet for Trump. This information is a handy backdrop for the news reported today by Mike Allen of Axios, who says that House speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has given to FNC host Carlson—who figured prominently in the election fraud lies—exclusive access to 41,000 hours of footage from the U.S. Capitol of the January 6, 2021, attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. According to Allen, Carlson’s producers have already begun going through it to see what they can use on his show.

Putin is scheduled to address the Russian Federal Assembly tomorrow. Billboards in Russia proclaim: “Russia’s border ends nowhere,” but observers believe that he was hoping for a major victory on a battlefield in Ukraine before the speech. Instead, Russian forces have taken severe losses in their recent stalled offensive in eastern Ukraine near Bakhmut.

Biden’s speech in Poland will follow later in the day.

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH BIDEN, VISITS KYIV, UKRAINE, AS AIR RAID SIRENS WAIL

President Biden’s secret visit to wartime Kyiv is an example of America in its finest tradition.

The New York Times reports that after a “trans-Atlantic flight to Poland, Mr. Biden crossed the border by train, traveling for nearly 10 hours to Kyiv as other American officials have in recent months.”

This trip took guts.

At home, it may often feel like our republic is irretrievably fractured. Abroad, mistakes and wrong turns (along with four years of Trump and assholes like Marjorie Taylor Green) have tarnished our reputation for competence and steadfastness. But America is still, for all its faults, seen in dark and terrible places as the last best hope. Beyond our shores, people still react to our presidents with hope.
Two presidents in front of St. Michael’s Cathedral, Kyiv, Ukraine

Notice this is THE President of the USofA . . . not the old blubbering fool living in a motel on a golf course in Florida.

The raving idiot Marjorie Taylor Greene releases another brain fart

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, called on Saturday for President Joe Biden to be impeached over sending aid to Ukraine.

The GOP lawmaker retweeted a video clip from April 2022 of Biden vowing to support Ukrainian citizens amid the Eastern European country’s ongoing war with Russia.

“Joe Biden will be impeached. Ukraine is NOT the 51st state!!! We are in over $34 TRILLION in debt, borders invaded daily by the thousands, and Americans have been poisoned in East Palestine. ENOUGH!!! IMPEACH BIDEN!!!” Greene wrote on Twitter on Saturday.

No details were provided on whether or not Greene has a proposal in place or is considering a plan that would lead to impeaching the president.

It’s basic logic

Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.

The elementary rule of logic: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. The existence of “god” is everyday asserted without evidence, only with “faith”.  Thus, if it can be asserted without evidence, the claim of “god’s” existence can be dismissed without evidence.

Don’t want the government on our back? Fine, move to Rio Verde Foothills, Arizona, and die of thirst.

The libertarian paradise of Rio Verde Foothills is nestled out in the desert near Scottsdale, Arizona.

It was formed specifically to avoid the rules and regulations required for civilized society, and it is situated in dry, harsh conditions. For example, Arizona law requires developers to plan for 100 years of water use. Every new development has to engage in a process for securing water rights in compliance with the law. Rio Verde Foothills avoided that requirement by exploiting a big loophole in the law: It only requires it for subdivisions larger than five homes. You can guess what developers in Rio Verde Foothills did to circumvent that—they built five-home lots. For them, it was an easy payday, and the self-styled “rugged individualists” who chose to live there could brag about keeping government off their backs and paying fewer taxes. The area doesn’t even have a government.

Problem is, they live in a desert. Humans need water to survive.

For a while, all was good; Rio Verde Foothills was supplied by Scottsdale. Water trucks would roll out to a tap at the edge of town, fill up, then truck that water to individual homes, filling a standard 5,000-gallon tank buried in their yards.

But for years, the city warned that the agreement could not continue in perpetuity. It needed the water for its own growth. Rio Verde Foothills ignored the issue—until the day that Scottsdale finally cut them off.

“We’ve been telling them for five years since this began that we are not their permanent water solution,” said Valerie Schneider, Scottsdale Water’s Public information officer. “At some point, we have to realize this is our water, we’re in a drought, we’re in a Colorado River shortage so we have to take a stance.”

One resident hilariously told The Guardian that “her community didn’t ‘want a handout’ from Scottsdale. They want time to figure out a plan and, to her, Scottsdale shutting the water off is unneighborly and un-American.” Apparently, five years wasn’t enough. And … funny to hear a libertarian talk about being “unneighborly.” Isn’t that literally their thing? That woman had more to say:

“Think of the sacrifices some Americans have made for each other. And then these people are sitting here saying, ‘Well, you know, you should just dry up and die.’ Really? I just find it mind-blowingly unpatriotic,” she said.

Let me find that head-mushroom-cloud emoji … 🤯

Nothing says “AMERICA FUCK YEAH” more than putting up a house in the middle of a desert, without any regard to infrastructure, in a place designed to avoid laws, regulations, and government, and then crying when someone else won’t cater to your needs and whims. AMERICA!

Residents have had two options: one, have the private water haulers find other sources of water, which they’ve already done. But those sources are further out and are just as subject to being cut off, as Scottsdale did. This increases uncertainty and costs. Libertarian free-market principles can get pricey!

The other option was, well, government.

Incorporating could give the community more options for water supply in future but forming an official town or city brings requirements, such as paved roads, street lights, more taxation and rules.

Dear god, could you imagine? Well, what about creating a new water district? That could also work!

When some proposed forming their own self-funded water provider, other residents revolted, saying the idea would foist an expensive, freedom-stealing new arm of government on them. The idea collapsed.

Um, why?

“I don’t want to control water. That’s not my business,” Reim said. “I just want my neighbors to have water [locally] from whatever source we got to get it from.”

Hold on, hold on … I need to hear this this again

🤯

I’m not even going to try and decipher that.

That hasn’t stopped residents from suing the city of Scottsdale to force them to continue providing water, because while they don’t want government on their doorstep, they fully expect some other government to cater to their needs. You know, because they’re such rugged individualists.

This story is being repeated all around Arizona, from Kingman in the Mojave desert, to Cochise County near the Mexican border. It always pits deep-red conservative-libertarian regions against a sudden realization that maybe government rules and regulations exist for a reason, that society can’t exist without them. As one Republican quoted in the Kingman article says, “We are very conservative – I think we’re one of the reddest areas of a red state right now. I don’t think securing your water supply is a partisan issue, or it shouldn’t be.” You see, once they are affected, it’s no longer partisan. Why politicize the things conservatism inherently politicizes?

You ever hear about the libertarian utopia in New Hampshire that was taken down by bears? There was a great book about it, titled A Libertarian Walks Into a Bear. From the book’s summary:

Once upon a time, a group of libertarians got together and hatched the Free Town Project, a plan to take over an American town and completely eliminate its government. In 2004, they set their sights on Grafton, NH, a barely populated settlement with one paved road.
When they descended on Grafton, public funding for pretty much everything shrank: the fire department, the library, the schoolhouse. State and federal laws became meek suggestions, scarcely heard in the town’s thick wilderness.
The anything-goes atmosphere soon caught the attention of Grafton’s neighbors: the bears. Freedom-loving citizens ignored hunting laws and regulations on food disposal. They built a tent city in an effort to get off the grid. The bears smelled food and opportunity.

This Vox story interviewed the author, and he was asked why the experiment failed.

It turns out that if you have a bunch of people living in the woods in nontraditional living situations, each of which is managing food in their own way and their waste streams in their own way, then you’re essentially teaching the bears in the region that every human habitation is like a puzzle that has to be solved in order to unlock its caloric payload. And so the bears in the area started to take notice of the fact that there were calories available in houses.

One thing that the Free Towners did that encouraged the bears was unintentional, in that they just threw their waste out how they wanted. They didn’t want the government to tell them how to manage their potential bear attractants. The other way was intentional, in that some people just started feeding the bears just for the joy and pleasure of watching them eat.

So weird how lawlessness has consequences!

Back in Arizona, Scottsdale is about to agree to a three-year extension of Rio Verde Foothills’ water, assuming it gets additional water from outside sources.

Ironically, those libertarians will get a temporary reprieve because of—you know it—government.

The Dominion voting machine company has Fox by the throat and they are not turning Fox loose

The biggest names at Fox News are a pack of liars. It’s not new information, but there is new information to support that point, thanks to a filing in the defamation lawsuit against Fox News brought by Dominion Voting Systems. Winning a defamation lawsuit against a news network requires meeting an extremely high standard of proof, but this is about as strong a case as you can imagine: Dominion has pages of internal communications between top Fox News personalities and executives showing that they knew what they were doing. Dominion’s case is so strong, in fact, that the new filing is a motion for summary judgment on liability in its $1.6 billion lawsuit against Fox News. (A summary judgment on liability would not settle the question of damages.)

Summary judgment involves one party in civil litigation asking a judge to rule based on evidence and material facts that a trial is not needed. It’s almost always the defendant asking for summary judgment. Here, the plaintiff, Dominion, is asking for summary judgment on the basis of the evidence it has assembled—despite the usual difficulty of winning a defamation suit at all. That is what you call confidence in your filing. And the filing backs it up with page after page of quotes from the likes of Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, Rupert Murdoch, and Fox News Media CEO Suzanne Scott, showing that they knew the score. Maybe there were some true believers left at Fox, but they were not the majority. Fox News pushed lies about Dominion for its own cynical reasons.

“Sidney Powell is lying.” Tucker Carlson to his producer Alex Pfeiffer, November 16, 2020 (Ex.150)

“Sidney Powell is a bit nuts. Sorry but she is.” Laura Ingraham to Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, November 15, 2020 ( Ex.155 at FNN035_03890539)

“Really crazy stuff.” Rupert Murdoch, November 19, 2020 (Ex.156)

They knew it was nonsense, but they were worried about losing their voters to Newsmax and OAN. Trump supporters were already angry with Fox for calling Arizona for Joe Biden on Election Night, and Newsmax and OAN were all in on election lies. Not alienating the Trump base meant Fox News had to offer those viewers at least some of what they wanted.

On Jan. 5, 2021, Murdoch wrote to Scott, “It’s been suggested our prime time three should independently or together say something like the election is over and Joe Biden won.” That would be helpful, Murdoch said, because “such a statement would go a long way to stop the Trump myth that the election stolen.” Forwarding the email, Scott noted, “I told Rupert that privately they are all there we need to be careful about using the shows and pissing off the viewers but they know how to navigate.”

That didn’t stop Fox News from continuing to push election lies, and—relevant to the Dominion lawsuit—lies specifically about Dominion having stolen votes, even as Dominion repeatedly reached out to the network with facts, calling on it to stop spreading lies.

As Murdoch said to Scott following the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, “All very well for Sean [Hannity] to tell you he was in despair about Trump but what did he tell his viewers?” That’s a question for all of Fox News to answer.

The Dominion filing, which is excellent reading material, offers a long list of examples of the same Fox News personalities and executives who pushed election lies showing that they knew at least some of what the network was airing was false.

On Nov. 18, 2020, Tucker Carlson told Laura Ingraham, “Sidney Powell is lying by the way. I caught her. It’s insane.”

“Sidney is a complete nut. No one will work with her. Ditto with Rudy,” Ingraham responded.

“It’s unbelievably offensive to me. Our viewers are good people and they believe it,” Carlson responded. But Powell and Giuliani continued to make appearances on Fox News for weeks thereafter.

For instance, according to the filing:

[Lou] Dobbs had Powell on his show yet again on November 30 , again publishing the fraud and algorithm lies. . .

Two days prior to this, on November 27, Fawcett had again texted Dobbs asking if Dobbs had read Powell’s lawsuit (Dobbs confirmed he had) and stating those suits were “complete bs “

The day after Powell’s “Kraken” lawsuits were dismissed, Dobbs had her on as a guest again.

When Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich accurately fact-checked a Trump tweet about the election having been stolen, Carlson went ballistic, telling Hannity in a group text, “Please get her fired. Seriously … What the fuck ? I’m actually shocked. It needs to stop immediately, like tonight. It’s measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down. Not a joke.”

Carlson’s reference to the stock price was not a side note—he was concerned about the network losing viewership to Newsmax and OAN.

Suzanne Scott, CEO of Fox News Media, got involved in policing the Heinrich tweet, telling other executives, “Sean texted me he’s standing down on responding but not happy about this and doesn’t understand how this is allowed to happen from anyone in news. She [Heinrich] has serious nerve doing this and if this gets picked up, viewers are going to be further disgusted.” 

Heinrich deleted her fact-check tweet—even though it was accurate.

Carlson’s concern about stock prices may also have come out when, on Jan. 26, he had Pillow Man Mike Lindell on his show to spread lies about Dominion. Lindell, after all, may have been making claims that Carlson and his producer had privately made clear they knew were false, but he was a top advertiser.

The standard for summary judgment, cited also by the Dominion filing, is that a court should grant summary judgment if the party seeking it can “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” In layman’s terms, Dominion is saying that there are no meaningful facts in dispute, meaning there’s no need for a trial, and that the law requires the judge to find that Fox News  did indeed defame the company.

Fox may try to claim there is genuine dispute as to material fact, but with this level of evidence—from internal communications at the time the claims about Dominion were being regularly aired on Fox News and Fox News Business—they’re going to have to get creative.

Dominion’s lawyers write in the filing, “The movant bears the initial burden of showing that undisputed material facts support its motion, but once that burden is met, the burden shifts to the non-movant, who must show material issues of fact exist and who ‘may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of the adverse party’s pleading’ but instead ‘must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.’” Your move, Fox News. And the response filing, too, may be very entertaining, albeit in a different way.

It’s amazing that Fox News let this lawsuit get to this point, with so much damaging material being publicly aired and brought as evidence in court. And yet Tucker Carlson is still, to this day, encouraging viewers to question the results of the 2020 election: