Our Constitutional Republic faces a clear and present danger more deadly than that of the Civil War. The danger is the Republican Party, a "political party" that has sold out to white supremacy, autocracy, misogyny, and hatred of everything our Nation stands for. Republicans dismiss any sense of a common American narrative. The "Republican Party" is an outlier in our history – ideologically extreme; contemptuous of social and economic policies that have sustained us for a century; unwilling to compromise; dismissive of evidence, fact, and science; dismissive of the legitimacy of any viewpoint except their own. America needs to face the simple, frightening fact that the Republican Party is a clear and present danger to our Constitutional Republic.
Lauren Boebert — who frequently claims to be “christian” — quietly announced that she’s going to be a grandma at age 36.
Her 17 year old son knocked up his 16 year old girlfriend.
UPDATE
Lauren Boebert’s son appears to be a statutory rapist. The age of consent in Colorado is 17. The girl was 15.
Boebert is against sex education in school. She has a rap sheet and is married a man who exposed himself to minors in a bowling alley.
She’s a member of Congress. And she’s a biblethumping Republican.
In 1926 Ernest Hemmingway published his novel The Sun Also Rises, which has this extraordinary bit of dialogue about how change happens in most aspects of life — and how governments rise and fall.
“How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked.
”Two ways,” Mike said. “Gradually and then suddenly.”
”What brought it on?”
“Friends,” said Mike. “I had a lot of friends. False friends.”
For some unfathomable reason, Democrats insist on calling their Republican colleagues their “friends.” They are not friends.
With few exceptions, they are systematically destroying American democracy with the clear objective of replacing it with strongman authoritarianism, a new and American version of what Benito Mussolini called fascism.
Right now they’re moving gradually:
— Infiltrating police departments and the enlisted ranks of the military
— Taking over school boards and local boards of elections
— Firing principals and teachers who defend multiracial, multicultural democracy while banning books that contain such “dangerous” ideas
— Demonizing queer people and outlawing drag shows
— Working with Tucker Carlson and Fox “News” to completely rewrite the history of January 6th
— Gerrymandering states so regardless of how people vote, Republicans control the levers of power
— Changing election laws so they can both make it harder for city-dwellers to vote and to ignore and then change the outcomes of elections they don’t like
— Building media structures that will support the authoritarian takeover when it happens
— Organizing armed paramilitary militias, with back-channel connections to local police
— Creating legal organizations to sanitize and rationalize ending messy democracy
— Radicalizing average Americans through social media and an ever-growing network of hard-right radio shows and podcasts
— Spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories about Democrats and Jews using the dog whistle of “George Soros”
— Firebombing Texas Democratic Party’s Austin headquarters and threatening them that if they don’t stop trying to get Democrats elected worse will come
We’ve seen this movie before.
It was “the other 9/11.” Everything seemed normal until General Pinochet declared he was taking over the government of Chile on September 11, 1973.
The Chilean government had been run democratically since 1923, the longest in South America, but Pinochet (with help from the Nixon administration) had already infiltrated and gotten the loyalty of both the police, the army, and the civilian paramilitaries he’d spent the previous few years nurturing.
So when he rolled up to the presidential palace and declared he was taking over, nobody came to the defense of the elected president, Salvador Allende. The police were already loyal to Pinochet, including the police who defended that nation’s capitol.
Allende, along with around 30 supporters, held the palace for a few hours, gave a short national radio address, and then put a gun to his head and ended his presidency.
Gradually, then suddenly.
When Chileans poured into the streets, Pinochet swept them up and held them in the national stadium, where tens of thousands were tortured, murdered, or simply disappeared. One of the favorite tactics of his military was to throw “liberals” out of helicopters over the ocean to kill them, a practice celebrated by rightwing militia around the US today.
Pinochet’s democratic political opposition lost all its power and went underground; it would be seventeen years before anything resembling democracy would return to Chile, a process that is still pulling itself together.
If Mike Pence had gone along with Trump’s plan to imitate the election of 1876 and install the guy who lost both the popular and the electoral vote as president, America would be a very, very different country today.
Gradually, then suddenly.
Trump had previously proclaimed his desire to change the nation’s libel and slander laws so he could sue or imprison his political opponents and those in the media who opposed him; if he had succeeded on January 6th, that would have happened by now, and people like me (and maybe you) would be in jail.
Echoing one of Pinochet’s first 1973 laws, a Republican state legislator in Florida just proposed legislation requiring bloggers and writers to register with the state if they intend to criticize any elected official; had Trump succeeded we’d all be living under similar laws today.
Trump had previously promised his violent partisans that he’d pardon them and pick up their legal fees; if he’d held onto the White House, by now hundreds of Kyle Rittenhouse’s would have “defended themselves” against Black people, “Antifa,” and “commie liberals”without consequence.
If Republicans held a large enough majority in Congress, a constitutional convention like rightwing billionaires have been promoting and annually rehearsing in Washington, DC would be underway to rewrite our founding document. The right of all Americans to vote, separation of church and state, civil rights, protections of free speech and assembly, the right to due process and equal protection under the law, even the obscure Emoluments Clause would all be on the chopping block.
Trump-friendly corporations would be running political purges reminiscent of the Republican “Red Scare” and “Blacklist”1950s all across the country as social media accounts were examined for evidence of “leftist” leanings; Johnny McEntee began that process when he was “Deputy President” to Trump and was firing people in the executive branch for “liking” postings by “leftwing” entertainers like Taylor Swift.
The process Trump started in Portland and Seattle in the summer of 2020 of unmarked vans and stormtrooper-like federal police with no identifying patches kidnapping people off the streets would have expanded nationwide; tens of thousands would be in custody without charges.
Private prisons would expand to take in the hundreds of thousands of people arrested protesting in the streets or for speaking out on social media. For most Americans who voted Republican or were completely apolitical, though, life would go on as normal (just like in the early years of the takeovers of Chile, Russia, and Hungary — or Italy, Germany and Spain in the 1930s).
A handful of high-profile progressive politicians would have been assassinated or survived assassination attempts; the police and the FBI, however, would have been as clueless about their killers (or complicit) as they were about 10,000 people planning to storm the Capitol and assassinate the Vice President and Speaker of the House on January 6th.
The Democratic Party would have been labeled the aggressors and as subversives by rightwing media; its ranks by now would have melted away as quickly as the union-aligned parties did in Italy and Germany in the 1930s or the Allende Socialists in Chile in 1973.
First abortion would be criminalized nationwide, then birth control, then women in business and politics would find themselves under constant attack in the media and the workplace. White male dominance would by now be close to reattaining the status it had in 1972 when women couldn’t legally get an abortion, sign some contracts, or even get a credit card without the signature of a father or husband.
Newsrooms across the country would be purged by now of liberals and running editorials in support of the “new patriotism” proclaimed by the GOP; the hedge funds headed up by rightwing billionaires — who today own over half of all the nation’s newspapers — would be snapping up the rest of the nation’s media like Viktor Orbán’s oligarch buddies did in Hungary.
Every time these sorts of coups happen, the nation’s people are shocked and surprised. They had no idea how far things had gone. It even happened that way with the American Revolution and the Civil War.
Gradually, then suddenly.
Trump’s supporters are today openly calling for the end of democracy, for book banning, and for public executions of Democratic politicians. The leader of the Republicans in the House of Representatives refused to even reprimand Representative Paul Gosar for openly celebrating his fantasy murder of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
A multimillionaire former head of The Carlyle Group with no political experience, running on a platform of auditing the 2020 election and not much else, won the governorship of Virginia by spreading the naked, racist lie that Democrats in that state were indoctrinating white children to feel ashamed of the color of their skin; not a single elected Republican and only a rare few in the media called him out.
When Franklin D. Roosevelt faced the fascist “America First” movement within the GOP, he went to political war with them and the Supreme Court that backed them.
“They hate me,” he thundered to cheers, “and I welcome their hatred!”
President Biden appears to think he can negotiate with these people who want to remake America in Pinochet’s image (with the same type of Chicago School neoliberal advisors who helped Pinochet turn Chile into an autocratic nightmare).
He’s wrong.
They are building their power and their organizations right now; armed paramilitary groups are expanding across the country as the GOP has become so radicalized that they even proclaim Liz Cheney as their enemy.
Billionaire-owned media properties like Fox “News” and hate-talk radio push naked lies to their viewers and listeners — all to make a buck and consolidate their political power — with no loss of audience.
And they’re packing our courts with young, hardcore rightwing ideologues.
Republicans are openly preparing for a second Civil War, calling for a “national divorce.”
In Michigan, a militia group nearly kidnapped and killed that state’s governor; they were stopped by an insider who turned states’ evidence. Last week another group was found planning to murder that state’s openly lesbian Attorney General.
Meanwhile, all across social media, the word is spreading: “The storm is upon us.”
January 6th was a rehearsal; they’re now planning 2024. Coups build to an explosive tipping point, then suddenly appear as a fait accompli.
Unless we stop them in-process, this may be our last chance.
Gradually, then suddenly.
Ivanka Trump, daughter of former President Donald Trump, broke with her father’s defense in a New York fraud case.
Bloomberg News correspondent Erik Larson reported that Trump had joined her father and brothers in asking for a trial delay, but she offered a very different reason.
According to Larson, Trump’s lawyer has argued that the case is “not simple” because she left the Trump organization in 2017 and has a “unique” defense because she has not been accused of lying about the company’s finances.
“The Complaint does not contain a single allegation that Ms. Trump directly or indirectly created, prepared, reviewed, or certified any of her father’s financial statements,” Trump’s attorney said in a court filing this week.
The document alleges “that other individuals were responsible for those tasks.”
Earlier this week, attorneys for the former president requested a delay to push the fraud trial from Oct. 2 to deeper into the 2024 presidential campaign.
New York Attorney General Letitia James has accused Donald Trump and his children of fraudulently manipulating real estate values for profit.
Judge Arthur Engoron previously said that the trial would be held on Oct. 2 “come hell or high water.”
Two months after the Trump Organization was fined $1.6 million dollars over tax fraud, the company headed by Donald Trump has suddenly gone dark on its financial situation which could be a sign it is in trouble.
According to a report from the Daily Beast’s Jose Pagliery, a report that was released last week by a retired judge who was assigned to “babysit” the embattled company stated the company and its executives have “…not provided a 2022 statement of financial condition to any third parties, and do not intend to do so.”
As the Daily Beast report notes, the “statement of financial condition” is a legal document that lists the “company’s assets and liabilities. But notably, it must also include disclosures describing how the numbers were put together. These are the very documents the Trumps are accused of faking for years, padding the numbers with nonexistent real estate space in Trump Tower and hyperinflated values for undeveloped land.”
The lack of transparency will likely set off alarms.
“The Trump Organization’s financial statements are now the center of the New York attorney general’s massive fraud investigation; and any large real estate company would have to regularly make financial condition statements anytime it seeks to borrow money for a project from a reputable lender,” Pagliery wrote before adding, “That means that, either the Trump Organization has fallen on hard times, found a bank willing to do business without responsible paperwork, or isn’t telling the truth.”
The Beast report also adds that the information black-out could also be a sign that the company has found a “sketchy” financial partner to help it stay afloat which could be an object of a future investigation.
You can read more here.
Background:
Fox News continues to vehemently deny the allegations made against them in Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion lawsuit against their network, claiming that they were only trying to report both sides of a controversy.
But to the contrary, argued former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance on MSNBC’s “Deadline: White House” on Tuesday, Dominion has ample evidence that Fox was willfully spreading false information, putting on claims they rigged the 2020 presidential election while executives and top on-air personalities privately admitted to knowing it was all false. And this, she said, is a degree of evidence you don’t usually see in defamation cases.
“I want to understand, Joyce, what the significance is, again, of Sidney Powell was only on TV because she was peddling the lie that these hosts knew to be just that, a lie,” said anchor Nicolle Wallace. “They also understand that their viewers believed it. How do those sorts of peeks into their inner understanding of the facts play as this lawsuit goes forward?”
“So this is absolutely the key point in this lawsuit for Fox. This is the hurdle that they face,” said Vance. “So the defamation here would be Fox defamation of Dominion and their voting machines, not their perpetration of the Big Lie. But ultimately, it’s just one big ball of wax, because if the Big Lie isn’t true, then the claims against Dominion aren’t true. And in a libel case where you have a public figure as the plaintiff — and for better or worse, the courts have decided that little Dominion Voting Machines is a public figure — they have to prove that Fox acted with actual malice. That the statements that Fox made were made with knowledge of their falsity, or with reckless disregard for their truth.”
“Usually when you have this sort of a defamation case, you’re in that reckless disregard sort of prong,” said Vance. However, “that is not what is going on here. The evidence that Dominion has is that Fox absolutely knew that it wasn’t true, that their internal communications proved that ... a long time ago in Washington, D.C. as a young lawyer, I participated in a defamation case involving Pat Robertson, who was then a presidential candidate, and this burden of proof was so high, this need that he had to prove that the people who he said had defamed him, had acted with actual malice. And the burden is even higher than in most civil lawsuits whereas we know from your explanations daily, the burden of proof is usually the preponderance of the evidence. But here for actual malice, it is clear and convincing evidence, it is something that almost approaches the standard in the criminal justice system, you just don’t see that in these sorts of defamation cases.”
“Here at Dominion, I think it has it,” Vance added. “These internal communications make it very clear that they knew there was falsity. That they acted with actual malice. The only thing left for anyone to decide is damages. You don’t see that in these cases. I think we might see it as to some claims here.”
Source: ABC News
Two people charged in a coordinated attack on police officers during the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol now appear to be on the lam and a judge issued warrants for their arrest just as one of them was set to go on trial this week, court records show.
U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols unsealed bench warrants last week for Olivia Pollock and Joseph Hutchinson, both of Florida, who along with three others are accused of a series of assaults on law enforcement outside the Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot.
After his arrest, Hutchinson was ordered to remain on home detention while Olivia Pollock was ordered to have a GPS monitor on her ankle.
FBI officials in Lakeland, Florida told the Associated Press that both Olivia Pollock and Hutchinson are believed to have tampered with and removed their ankle monitors before they vanished.
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/jan-6-defendants-apparently-disappear-eve-trial-court/story?id=97670591
On Saturday night, America’s most prominent conservative love-in, the Conservative Policy Action Conference (CPAC), closed with an apocalyptic message. Dystopian nightmares replaced the sunny optimism of “Morning in America” as Trump lumbered through a two-hour long, policy-light invective before a smaller-than-hoped-for crowd.
As the Guardian put it, “There was no doubt that former president Trump remained the big fish at the National Harbor in Maryland – but in a smaller pond.”
This observation illustrates the ridiculous media opinion of Trump. On the one hand, the talking heads deny Trump is toast. On the other hand, they cannot ignore that Trump 2023 is a shadow of Trump 2015. The common wisdom is that Trump will win the primaries and lose the general.
That seems reasonable. A neutral analyst has to ask where Trump will find the additional votes to win a presidential election. Even if the MAGAs remain loyal, who will vote for Trump in 2024 that did not vote for him in 2020? What has Trump done in the last two years to convert a never-Trumper into a Trump enthusiast?
Neither he nor the GOP has come up with a single new policy. They continue to run on the unhinged insults that led to two disappointing elections. And that strategy will condemn the GOP to underwhelming results until they return, if they are still able, to their dismal roots.
In 1980, the election of Ronald Reagan, and his marriage of convenience with the Moral Majority, ushered in modern mainstream American conservatism. It was a political philosophy dedicated to the proposition that:
Today’s conservative is similar — except they believe that Russia is not so bad, that immigrants are also criminals, and the solution to drug addiction is a border wall.
The difference between a Reagan Republican and a MAGA Republican is that, back in the day, the GOP had a plan. They worked to pass legislation. They negotiated and compromised with Democrats (Tip O’Neill) when they had to. They even increased taxes when the failure of their absurd ‘deficit reduction through tax cuts’ philosophy became too obvious.
Today, the push by Republicans to enact their beliefs has taken a back seat to performative politics. In 2022, the GOP told the voters that inflation and a looming recession were crises. Yet after they clawed out a victory in the House, their energies have been dedicated to investigating Hunter Biden and slamming papa Joe for not taking a day trip to visit a train crash site.
Jim Jordan has used his leadership role to demonize the FBI, fret about the origin of COVID, and claim the Dems are gun grabbers (the GOP has been saying that since Obama in 2008 — no guns grabbed). Yet when pollsters ask voters which issues matter, gun policy is #8, the scope of the federal government #13, and COVID #18.
The economy is the #1 concern. Yet all the GOP does is complain about it without offering any solutions.
MT Greene has enthusiastically backed white nationalism and secession. Why? For the attention. She is merely gaslighting. This cracked actor has not even a pretense of a plan.
When they do have a strategy — as Rick Scott does for destroying Social Security and Medicare — they pick the wrong side in the one thing regular Republicans and Democrats agree on, leaving traditional Medicare and Social Security alone.
The GOP has one plan that bears fruit — bowdlerizing school curriculums to protect white kids’ feelings and punish children for being outside the bigender/heterosexual norm. Their strategy helped flip the Virginia governorship and elevated the leading non-Trump candidate, Ron DeSantis.
Not that DeSantis will cure what ails them. Never-Trumpers have promoted the Florida Governor as “Trump without the drama”. The problem is that he is just that. The base needs theatrics in their candidates. Jeb Bush’s candidacy collapsed in 2016, not because he had no ideas, but because he was dull.
Republicans paid attention, beat their chests, and sacrificed ideas on the altar of outrage. It makes them look good at CPAC, but non-MAGA Americans — who are the vast majority — are tired of it. And there seem to be more non-MAGAs every year.
Like a small child, the base wants fairy stories — entertainment without effort. There is little difference between today’s GOP, professional wrestling, and superhero movies. All are enjoyable — if you like that sort of thing — but it is no way to run a railroad.
Former New York Times columnist Bari Weiss recently founded a publication called The Free Press, and several weeks ago it published an account from a woman named Jamie Reed. Reed, who worked as a case manager at a Washington University gender clinic in St. Louis, made inflammatory accusations (with more in a sworn affidavit) that numerous children at the clinic were being carelessly shoved into irreversible gender treatment en masse.
Reed’s article went viral on social media, and was cited by numerous conservatives and transphobes as conclusive proof that too many kids are getting transition care. A couple of prominent liberals joined in as well. Matthew Yglesias cited it as credible on Twitter and Substack. “The picture she paints of the clinic’s treatment of children is ghastly. The affidavit she signed is even worse,” wrote Jonathan Chait at New York magazine. (It’s of a piece with an ongoing trend in liberal and centrist publications of writing anxious articles raising questions about youth transition care.)
There is just one problem. Reed’s account is a pile of garbage.
Even when it was first published, any sensible person should have seen some obvious red flags. Reed was not involved either in treatment or management, and her lawyer founded an openly transphobic organization. As Evan Urquhart pointed out at Assigned Media, she made several wildly mistaken claims about the side effects of some gender treatments. In her affidavit, Reed claimed that children came into the clinic identifying as “mushroom,” “rock,” or “helicopter,” only to be quickly given puberty blockers or hormones. This is not only facially preposterous, but in the last case suspiciously lines up with a common right-wing transphobic “joke.”
Sure enough, subsequent reporting has demolished Reed’s story. A woman named Danielle Meert whose child worked with Reed told a local NBC affiliate: “Saying that kids walk in and get hormones right away has not been our experience. It was about nine months until we had a puberty blocker implanted.” Another trans boy treated at the clinic contradicted her assertion that hormones were prescribed after just a couple of meetings with a therapist: “That’s not possible at all because a therapist has to see a patient for six months consistently, before they can even start writing the letter [of recommendation].” The Missouri Independent also interviewed numerous patients, who reported “any treatments were only undertaken after long consultations with doctors and mental health professionals.” Finally, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch recently interviewed numerous parents whose children had gone to the clinic, who “reported a well-defined, step-by-step approach that could be halted at any time.”
https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2023-03-02-right-wing-transphobia-panic/