President Biden to Republicans: “Take your impeachment and shove it.”

President Biden declined to appear before House impeachment investigators, writing in a Monday letter through an attorney that the investigation “is over.”

Though brief, the letter tears into the impeachment investigation being led in part by House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.), which has yet to uncover any wrongdoing by President Biden.

“Your Committee’s purported ‘impeachment inquiry’ has succeeded only in turning up abundant evidence that, in fact, the President has done nothing wrong. Yet rather than acknowledge this reality, your March 28, 2024, letter contains the same litany of false allegations that have been repeatedly debunked and refuted by the very witnesses you have called before your Committee and the many documents you have obtained,” Richard Sauber, special counsel to the president, wrote in a letter to Comer obtained by The Hill

“Your insistence on peddling these false and unsupported allegations despite ample evidence to the contrary makes one thing about your investigation abundantly clear: The facts do not matter to you.”

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/4596292-white-house-declines-comer-testimony-invite-declaring-impeachment-investigation-over/

US Capitol Police Chief testified before Congress last week

He assured Congress that they are well-prepared for any repeat of Jan 6, including the ability to call on the National Guard if needed.  He said:

“I will tell you that the National Guard is terrific,” Manger said. “But what I really need is trained, equipped law enforcement officers, who are trained in crowd control, civil disturbance. And, again, if we need it, we will have thousands of those on our campus.”

Fine, Chief, but what you really need is a LOT of automatic rifles and piles of ammo.  One lesson learned from Jan 6 was the bullet that killed Ashli Babbit was one and only one gunshot – – – but it stopped the whole crowd that was with her.

Drop a few of these assholes in their tracks with their heads turned to mush from an AR-15 round, and you stop the rest of them in their tracks.  And if they don’t stop, that’s why you need more ammo.

Let’s be very, very clear: Republicans want to restore the Comstock Act and make contraception a crime. Yes, they do.

Sam Alito and Erin Hawley made it very clear where the American anti-abortion outfit is heading, and as Irin Carmon explains it is a surpassingly horrible destination:

Pushed by the justices on both sides of the aisle, Erin Hawley, the attorney for the Alliance Defending Freedom and wife of insurrection-cheerleading Senator Josh Hawley, struggled to point to real-world harm her clients have already or would suffer under increased abortion-pill access. “You need a person to be able to come in and meet the courts’ regular standing requirements,” Justice Elena Kagan reminded Hawley. When Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asked Hawley to stop speculating and give her a real example of a doctor unable to use existing federal law to opt out of participating in abortion, it was somehow Justice Neil Gorsuch who jumped in to back her up and complain, “This case seems like a prime example of turning what could be a small lawsuit into a nationwide legislative assembly on an FDA rule or any other federal government action.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett also seemingly couldn’t find any evidence of actual harm to the two doctors Hawley claimed had the strongest claims: “I think the difficulty here is that at least to me, these affidavits do read more like the conscience objection is strictly to actually participating in the abortion to end the life of the embryo or fetus. And I don’t read either to say that they ever participated in that.”

This particular ploy may have been too thin to command the current court to undo the FDA’s considered judgment. Waiting in the wings, however, is another dream world in which abortion pills and even contraception could be banned under the Comstock Act — without the national attention or political costs of passing a new law. The zombie law, passed in 1873 and never repealed by Congress, makes it illegal to send through the mail “obscene Literature and Articles of immoral Use,” such as “any article or thing designed or intended for the prevention of conception or procuring of abortion.” That includes contraception. As law professors Reva Siegel and Mary Ziegler write in a forthcoming article about Comstock, his “objection was that abortion, contraception, and even placebos incentivized sexual impurity: while erotica stoked lust for both boys and girls, anything marketed as a contraceptive or abortifacient would facilitate licentiousness by allowing users to conceal their sin.”

The new enthusiasm for Comstock is not a secret. Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation–authored agenda for a Trump second term, proposes that the Justice Department “stop promoting or approving mail-order abortions in violation of long-standing federal laws that prohibit the mailing and interstate carriage of abortion drugs,” presumably with the compliance of a bevy of Trump-appointed (or just sympathetic) justices. Just last February, conservative legal strategist Jonathan Mitchell, sounding a little like a cartoon villain laying out his future plans, helpfully told the New York Times, “We don’t need a federal ban when we have Comstock on the books.” Even Mitchell knows the average American isn’t interested in returning fully to Victorian sexual norms, which is why he actually said that he hoped Trump wouldn’t ruin his barely hidden plan: “I hope he doesn’t know about the existence of Comstock, because I just don’t want him to shoot off his mouth,” adding, “I think the pro-life groups should keep their mouths shut as much as possible until the election.” So much for leaving it to the states.

Maybe that’s why, at oral argument, Justice Samuel Alito didn’t refer to the Comstock Act by its commonly used name, instead coyly using the obscure number in the U.S. Code.

Trump’s former attorney is pleading for $$$ . . . I thought Trump was fantastically wealthy and was willing to help his friends

Donald Trump’s coup-plotting associates are going through some things, as he might say.

Several of the people who were tapped to carry out Trump’s plan to overturn the 2020 election and stay in power have run into financial and/or legal trouble ever since.

That includes Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who’s facing criminal charges and civil litigation for his role in the scheme; Trump campaign lawyer Kenneth Chesebro, who pleaded guilty to a felony in Georgia’s 2020 election interference case and may have withheld information from other investigators; and Peter Navarro, who went to prison this week over contempt charges relating to the federal Jan. 6 probe.

And then there’s former Trump campaign lawyer John Eastman, who’s defending himself against criminal charges in Georgia and potential disbarment in California for his alleged role in devising and executing the coup plot. He’s also an unindicted co-conspirator in the federal Jan. 6 case against Trump, and special counsel Jack Smith’s office was reportedly still focused on Eastman as of late last year. Oh, and he already abruptly retired from his job as a law professor at a California university amid the controversy.

(In an August statement, Eastman’s legal team called Smith’s indictment a “misleading presentation of the record” that was intended “to cast ominous aspersions” on Trump’s “close advisors.”)

Given all that, Eastman appears to be in dire financial straits, and according to Right Wing Watch, has been portraying himself as a Christian nationalist hero to grift off of the MAGA movement’s most religious supporters.

The outlet reports that Eastman appeared virtually Monday at an event held by the Salt and Light Council, a Christian nationalist organization that promotes “biblical citizenship.” At the event, Eastman made several self-aggrandizing remarks portraying himself as a Christian holy warrior who’d been “cast in the forefront of this battle” against “tyranny.”

And then, of course, there was his pitch:

During his Salt and Light presentation, Eastman promoted his page on the Christian crowdfunding site GiveSendGo, where people have contributed more than $630,000 to his legal defense fund so far. He said he’s “about a million in the hole beyond that right now,” adding that he thinks his total legal costs will run between $3 million and $3.5 million.

 

For the unaware, GiveSendGo is a crowdfunding site popular among neo-Nazis and right-wing extremists. And Eastman, one of the most recognizable figures on the platform, is basically using it to pass around the collection plate hoping to shake loose some donations … in Jesus’ name.

The fact that he has to ask for the money in the first place underscores the precarious financial situations Trump and many of his allies — particularly, lawyers such as Giuliani and Eastman — have created for themselves by backing dubious election schemes.

Eastman clearly isn’t breaking the mold in his response, either. In fact, he seems to have perfected a Trumpian routine: get into trouble, drape yourself in the Bible, and hope your followers are too blinded by the “light” to see the obvious grift.

Phony Biden “impeachment” is dead, meanwhile, Russia preparing for war with NATO

More wisdom from Heather Cox Richardson, Letters from an American.

 

While Republicans on the House Oversight Committee continue to insist that President Joe Biden has committed crimes, testimony today by a former associate of Trump’s disgraced ex-lawyer Rudolph Giuliani was so damning not for Biden but for Republicans that Representative Stephen Lynch (D-MA) told his colleagues: “When you review the entire record of evidence of these hearings going back over a year, you’ve actually provided more evidence to impeach Donald Trump for a third time than you have in so much as laying a glove on Joe Biden.”

The effort to impeach Biden has faltered as Oversight chair James Comer (R-KY), other Republican members of the committee, and their colleagues have repeatedly told right-wing media that Biden was involved in corrupt business deals with foreign countries in the face of actual testimony and evidence that has not supported those allegations. Republican lawmakers and even right-wing media figures have begun to suggest that the investigation has turned up nothing and the effort should be abandoned. 

But House extremists have promised their base that they will impeach Biden, and Comer has steadfastly refused to back down. In a public hearing today, Republicans called as witnesses Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of President Biden’s son Hunter, and another business associate, Jason Galanis.  

Bobulinski is a Trump ally. Democrats called out inconsistencies in Bobulinski’s first testimony before the committee, and in his opening statement today, Bobulinki relied on his military record to prove his honesty. Then he called Hunter Biden and President Biden’s brother James Biden, both of whom testified under oath, liars. He also called Hunter Biden’s defense attorney a liar, and President Joe Biden “a serial liar and a fabulist.” Bobulinski went on: “Representatives Dan Goldman [D-NY] and Jamie Raskin [D-MD], both lawyers…, will continue to lie today in this hearing and then go straight to the media to tell more lies.”

Earlier this month, Bobulinski sued former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson for $10 million, calling her “a liar and a fraud” for her claim that Bobulinski had worn a ski mask when he met quietly with Hutchinson’s boss, Trump’s then chief of staff, Mark Meadows, at a campaign rally in Georgia. Hutchinson produced a photograph supporting her claim.

In his opening statement, Bobulinski claimed that “the Chinese Communist Party…successfully sought to infiltrate and compromise Joe Biden and the Obama-Biden White House.” He has insisted that Biden profited from Hunter Biden’s business deals, but his claims have never been verified, and other witnesses have testified that Biden was never involved in his son’s businesses.

Galanis is serving a 14-year sentence for defrauding a Native American tribe and numerous pension fund investors of tens of millions of dollars. He joined the proceedings virtually from federal prison.

While Bobulinski and Galanis continued to insist, without evidence, that Biden is corrupt, the eye-popping testimony today came from the witness called by the Democrats: Lev Parnas.

Parnas is a Ukrainian-born former associate of one-time Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani. He was deeply involved in the attempt to smear Hunter Biden before the 2020 presidential election. This attempt included then-president Trump’s 2019 phone call to Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky to force him to announce he was opening an investigation into the Ukrainian energy company on whose board Hunter Biden sat. Trump suggested he would not release the money Congress had appropriated to enable Ukraine to resist Russian incursions into Crimea until Zelensky agreed to such an announcement.

That call eventually led to Trump’s first impeachment, in December 2019.

During that impeachment and ever since, Parnas said, “I have never wavered from saying that there was no evidence of the Bidens’ corruption in Ukraine—because there truly was none. On the contrary, by setting up a search for false criminality, every individual majorly involved in this plan was disguising their own criminal activity. That persists to this very day: The impeachment proceedings that bring us here now are predicated on a bunch of false information that is being spread by the Kremlin.”

Parnas said, “My mission for Giuliani and Trump would come to encompass nearly a year of traveling across the globe to find damaging information on the Bidens. This included trips to Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Vienna, London, and other locations…. In my travels, I found precisely zero proof of the Bidens’ criminality.”

What he did find, Parnas said, was that “the Kremlin was forcing [disinformation] through Russian, Ukrainian, American, and other channels to interfere in our elections. Ultimately this was meant to benefit Trump’s re-election, which would in turn benefit Vladimir Putin.”

Every person pushing “the Biden corruption rumors” knew they were “baseless,” Parnas said. And then he named names: “Then-Congressman Devin Nunes [R-CA, who at the time chaired the House Intelligence Committee], Senator Ron Johnson [R-WI], then chair of the Senate Homeland Security Committee], and many other individuals understood that they were pushing a false narrative. The same goes for John Solomon [of The Hill], Sean Hannity, and media personnel, particularly at FOX News, who used that narrative to manipulate the public ahead of the 2020 election. They are still doing this today, as we approach the 2024 election.”

In 2022, Parnas was convicted of wire fraud, false statements, and breaking campaign finance laws by funneling money illegally to Trump and other Republican lawmakers (including then–California representative Kevin McCarthy, as longtime members of this community will remember).

In his testimony, Parnas noted: “When I was arrested, my original indictment linked me to an individual referred to as unindicted co-conspirator 1. We now know this individual to be Congressman Pete Sessions [R-TX], who sits on this very committee today.” Parnas also called out Trump’s attorney general Bill Barr, who he says knew about the attempt to smear the Bidens from the day he took office, and said that Trump personally encouraged Giuliani to interfere in Ukrainian politics.

As Justin Rohrlich of The Daily Beast put it, “Comer…stepped on rake after rake during the hearing, consistently undermining his own conference’s case.” Finally, after Democrats had pointed out the many missteps of the committee’s Republicans, Bobulinski told Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) that “the American people are well aware of the Bidens’ corruption.” “Perfect!” Moskowitz replied. He told Bobulinski to ask Comer why he hadn’t asked for an impeachment vote. Moskowitz even offered to help the Republicans out by making a motion to impeach President Biden, urging Comer to second it. Comer declined.

Moskowitz said he wanted “to show the American people that they’re never going to impeach Joe Biden. It’s never going to happen because they don’t have the evidence. Okay, this is a show. It’s all fake. They just want to do these hearings. It’s not leading to impeachment. They’re lying to their base on Newsmax and Fox leading these people to believe that they’re going to eventually impeach the president. It’s not going to happen. At all. Ever. Period.”

While today might well be the day the Republicans’ impeachment effort sputtered to a dismal end, Parnas’s testimony points forward. “We cannot divorce the impact of this conspiracy from the Russia-Ukraine war,” Parnas said, “because Trump has no intention to keep aiding Ukraine. I told him in 2018, and I am telling all of you now, that without the support of the United States and NATO, Ukraine will not be able to withstand the barrage from the Russian Army.”

House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), a Trump loyalist, continues to refuse to bring to a vote the national security supplemental bill passed by the Senate more than a month ago containing $60 billion in aid for Ukraine, although it is expected to pass if he does. Last week the administration announced a $300 million arms package made possible by Pentagon cost savings, and tonight, national security advisor Jake Sullivan is in Kyiv to reassure the Ukrainians that aid is coming. But while Ukrainian drone strikes have knocked out as much as 11% of Russia’s oil-refining capacity, lack of supplies has meant Ukraine’s troops have lost ground to Russian advances.

Those trying to get aid to Ukraine believe its defense is central to U.S. national security. Today the Institute for the Study of War, a nonpartisan, nonprofit research group, assessed that “[s]everal Russian financial, economic, and military indicators suggest that Russia is preparing for a large-scale conventional conflict with NATO, not imminently but likely on a shorter timeline than what some Western analysts have initially posited,” within a matter of years.

Trump is NOT a billionaire, he cannot come up with $450 million, and he is frantic

Donald Trump is in a bit of a financial bind: He can’t post the $464 million bond necessary to buy him time while he appeals the ruling in the New York civil fraud case brought by state Attorney General Letitia James.

Trump has floated the enticing idea of underwriting his nearly half-billion obligation to some 30 different organizations and, shockingly, found no takers. 

Trump absorbed the news with his usual grace, complaining bitterly about it Tuesday morning in at least seven posts on his social media platform Truth Social (which was down at the time of this writing).

“I would be forced to mortgage or sell Great Assets, perhaps at Fire Sale prices, and if and when I win the Appeal, they would be gone. Does that make sense?” Trump fumed in one post.

Trump’s excessively public self-victimization for being found guilty of breaking the law is a clarion call for cash—from his MAGA cultists and whoever else might find it useful to potentially have a grateful asset in the White House.

As The New Republic’s Timothy Noah told Greg Sargent on his new Daily Blast podcast, “Trump is broke, on the verge of bankruptcy, and he’s running for president. It’s a situation just ripe for corruption.”

The presidency, should Trump win it, is effectively up for sale to the highest bidder.

But Trump’s personal financial issues are just the tip of the iceberg for the man who just last week secured enough delegates to be the 2024 Republican nominee for president.

As his legal troubles continue to mount, the small-dollar donors who have funded much of Trump’s legal bills are starting to turn off the spigot. CNBC’s Brian Schwartz reports that in 2023, Trump’s reelection campaign raised 62.5% less money from small-dollar donors than in 2019, the year preceding the last presidential election. When the dust settled in 2020, Trump had raised nearly half of his total cash haul—$378 million—from small-dollar donations.

But the Trump campaign’s looming cash crunch doesn’t end there: The Republican Party’s traditional well-heeled donor class is also missing in action. Many of those donors kept Nikki Haley’s  rival bid for the GOP nomination afloat. Now they’re  directing more of their funds to congressional races and, in particular, the Republican effort to win back the Senate.

Trump hasn’t done himself any favors by promising to “permanently” bar Haley donors from his MAGA movement. In fact, the Biden campaign clearly sees an opening there and is making a play for Haley donors.

Biden made his own fundraising pitch when Haley ended her campaign, tweeting, “You don’t have to agree with me on everything to know MAGA extremism is a threat to this country. We need everyone on board—join our campaign.” The tweet included a link to the Biden-Harris campaign fundraising page.

Since securing the required delegates, Trump has taken over the Republican National Committee with high hopes of a cash infusion he can use to pay his legal bills. Except the RNC is broke—entering the year with just $8 million cash on hand and nearly $2 million in debt. Those are some downright dismal numbers. And despite Trump’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump promising to pay her father-in-law’s legal bills, the RNC faces the same uphill fundraising battle that Trump does.

Trump’s archenemy, former Rep. Liz Cheney, took the opportunity to send out a buyer beware missive on Monday.

“Is it just a coincidence that Donald Trump took over the RNC, fired most of its Republican staff, and installed his daughter-law as co-chair at the same time he’s become desperate for money and can’t post bond?” Cheney tweeted. “Donors better beware.”

While this month’s Daily Kos/Civiqs poll found that 63% of Republican voters are fine with the RNC paying Trump’s bills, it appears many of those voters aren’t personally coughing up the cash they used to.

That’s a serious problem for the RNC and, perhaps, all of its associated committees, though it’s possible GOP donors will shore up Senate Republicans’ finances even as they take a pass on Trump. As for House Republicans, it remains to be seen whether House Speaker Mike Johnson can keep pace with his predecessor, Kevin McCarthy, who was actually a fundraising stud.

And amid these harrowing cash-strapped times for Trump, the Republican Party is convulsing its way through a nasty divorce that will require a lot of time, effort, and money to clean up before November.

That’s a big messaging problem that is going to translate into a massive money problem. Even if Sephora sold enough lipstick to put on that pig, Trump wouldn’t have the cash on hand to buy it.

The walls are closing in on Trump . . . next two weeks will be fun!!!

The next two weeks will be fun . . . for everyone except Trump.

As we all know by know, Trump owes $450 million to NY because he was found  guilty of tax fraud, insurance fraud, and bank fraud.  Trump is appealing the verdict, however, in order to appeal, he must post a cash bond equal to the penalty — which means he must post $450 million bond by Monday, March 25.

Trump’s lawyers told the court they have asked four major brokers to try to find someone to put up the $450 million bond.  The brokers asked over 30 major financial institutions to help – – – NOT A SINGLE ONE WILL POST BOND FOR TRUMP.  NOT ONE.

Now it is entirely possible that NY will start to seize Trump’s property as bond.  Of course, the problem with that is no one knows the true value of Trump’s properties because he has lied and lied and lied about the true value of his real estate holdings.

Now, today, March 20, Trump fired off a Tweet on X in which he told the NY AG to “Keep your filthy hands off the iconic Trump Tower!”

“Iconic Trump Tower” my ass!!  Trump Tower is a common, old building on no particular notoriety.  Over 100 buildings in NYC are taller than Trump Tower.  Trump Tower has a lot of vacant space and is mostly a dump.

The NY AG is a Black lady . . . she does not have “filthy hands”.

Trump is losing his mind and this will put him over the edge.  Maybe the pressure will cause him to have a stroke and DIE.  We can always hope.

Why will no one lend Trump half a billion $$$ ??

Because they know he’s a liar and a crook.

Of course no one will lend Donald Trump the half-billion dollars he needs to put up while appealing his fraud case. Would you?

In recent months, the former president has racked up a series of costly legal judgments for his many misdeeds. And when I say “costly,” I mean slightly pricier than the Trump-brand gold sneakers. In fact, after summing up the judgments across all of Trump’s cases so far, he already owes more than the entire gross domestic product of several island nations — put together.

In the most expensive case, Trump was found liable for lying about the value of his real estate assets so he could get better terms on loans and insurance. In that judgment, he owes $464 million, after interest. He’s appealing the case, which was brought by the New York attorney general. In the meantime, a judge has said Trump must put up cash or bond to prove he’s good for the money and isn’t appealing merely to delay payment for a while.

Despite boasting about his deep pockets — and even saying in a deposition last year that he had “substantially in excess of $400 million in cash” — Trump has struggled to come up with the dough. So, he tried to get out of it. First, his lawyers asked to instead post a $100 million bond. After all, Trump treats every bill he receives as merely an opening offer — even when it’s a court ruling.

The judge said no.

Then, on Monday, his lawyers came back and complained that no one would agree to post a bond on his behalf. The company hired to help secure a bond package said it had reached out to “virtually every major surety in the market” and spent “countless hours negotiating with one of the largest insurance companies in the world.” The lawyers said a key challenge was that Trump wanted to use his real estate as collateral for the bond, and none of the major surety companies would accept it.

Got that? Trump owes this money because he fraudulently misrepresented the value of his assets, and now apparently no one will accept those assets as collateral.